People v. Tolliver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tolliver

108 A.D.3d 685, 968 N.Y.S.2d 399

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 17, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A.D.3d 685 (People v. Tolliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tolliver, 108 A.D.3d 685, 968 N.Y.S.2d 399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two amended sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), both imposed April 2, 2012, on the ground that the amended sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the amended sentences are affirmed.

The amended sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two amended sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), both imposed April 2, 2012, on the ground that the amended sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the amended sentences are affirmed.

The amended sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.3d 685, 968 N.Y.S.2d 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tolliver-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack