People v. Tolbert

251 A.D.2d 44, 674 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6441

This text of 251 A.D.2d 44 (People v. Tolbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tolbert, 251 A.D.2d 44, 674 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered December 4, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 4 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was lawfully sentenced to a term of 4 years to life, as a persistent violent felony offender, upon his conviction of a class E violent felony offense. When, under Penal Law former § 70.08, the Legislature omitted any minimum term of imprisonment for a persistent violent felony offender convicted of a class E violent felony, the Court of Appeals determined that the lawful sentence in that situation was 2 years to life (People v Green, 68 NY2d 151), based on the fact that the mandatory sentence for a second violent felony offender convicted of a class E violent felony was an indeterminate term of 2 to 4 years. The 1995 amendments to the Penal Law concerning sentencing (L 1995, ch 3), in effect at the time of the instant crime, likewise failed to specify any minimum period of imprisonment for a persistent violent felony offender convicted of a class E violent felony. Accordingly, we apply the same analysis employed by the Green Court and conclude that a defendant in this situation may now receive a sentence of 3, 3V2, or 4 years to life. We base this conclusion on the fact that the mandatory sentence for a second violent felony offender convicted of a class E violent felony is now a determinate term of 3, 3V2, or 4 years (Penal Law § 70.04 [2], [3] [d]), and we reject defendant’s arguments to the contrary. Since this defendant bargained for a sentence of 4 years to life, and 4 years to life is a lawful sentence, we see no reason to disturb that sentence. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Green
497 N.E.2d 665 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 44, 674 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tolbert-nyappdiv-1998.