People v. Tlatenchi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tlatenchi

192 A.D.2d 565, 596 N.Y.S.2d 728

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 565 (People v. Tlatenchi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tlatenchi, 192 A.D.2d 565, 596 N.Y.S.2d 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Goldstein, J.), rendered August 5, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied the suppression of the gun found in the vehicle occupied by the defendant (see, People v Sanchez, 192 AD2d 562 [decided herewith]).

Furthermore, the trial court’s charge on the statutory presumption of possession of a weapon (see, Penal Law § 265.15 [3]) was proper (see, People v Sanchez, supra). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Goldstein, J.), rendered August 5, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied the suppression of the gun found in the vehicle occupied by the defendant (see, People v Sanchez, 192 AD2d 562 [decided herewith]).

Furthermore, the trial court’s charge on the statutory presumption of possession of a weapon (see, Penal Law § 265.15 [3]) was proper (see, People v Sanchez, supra). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 565, 596 N.Y.S.2d 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tlatenchi-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack