People v. Titer
This text of 176 A.D.2d 371 (People v. Titer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (King, J.), imposed November 20, 1990, upon his conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of four to eight years imprisonment and restitution in the amount of $200.
Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which imposed upon the defendant the obligation to pay restitution in the amount of $200; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.
The provision of the sentence which directed the defendant to pay restitution of the "buy” money was illegal (see, People v Rowe, 75 NY2d 948). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Fiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A.D.2d 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-titer-nyappdiv-1991.