People v. Tinsley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tinsley

242 A.D.2d 439, 662 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8760

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 439 (People v. Tinsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tinsley, 242 A.D.2d 439, 662 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered June 22, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that defendant actively participated in the sale. “The totality of circumstances * * * establish that defendant intentionally aided in the transaction rather than merely advising the undercover officer where drugs could be purchased” (People v Rivera, 241 AD2d 305; see also, People v Ayers, 189 AD2d 680, lv denied 81 NY2d 967). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered June 22, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that defendant actively participated in the sale. “The totality of circumstances * * * establish that defendant intentionally aided in the transaction rather than merely advising the undercover officer where drugs could be purchased” (People v Rivera, 241 AD2d 305; see also, People v Ayers, 189 AD2d 680, lv denied 81 NY2d 967). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 439, 662 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tinsley-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack