People v. Tineo

16 A.D.3d 165, 790 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2233
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[166]*166Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J), rendered April 2, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly declined to charge criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree as a lesser included offense. Given the large quantity of drugs possessed by defendant, their packaging, and the police observation of defendant making what appeared to be a sale immediately prior to his arrest, there was no reasonable view of the evidence to support a finding that defendant’s possession was without intent to sell (see People v Scarborough, 49 NY2d 364 [1980]; People v Henry, 272 AD2d 238 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 890 [2000]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tineo, 16 A.D.3d 165, 790 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

16 A.D.3d 165 (People v. Tineo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. O'Neal
44 A.D.3d 351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)