People v. Tillman

13 A.D.3d 471, 785 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Tillman. Read the opinion of the Court — 289 A.D.2d 1006

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J), rendered February 7, 2003, convicting him of rape in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Smith, J.P, Luciano, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tillman, 13 A.D.3d 471, 785 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

13 A.D.3d 471 (People v. Tillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)