People v. Tillery

300 A.D.2d 682, 751 N.Y.S.2d 781

This text of 300 A.D.2d 682 (People v. Tillery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tillery, 300 A.D.2d 682, 751 N.Y.S.2d 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—Appeal by the [683]*683defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered June 27, 2000, convicting him of murder in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 A.D.2d 682, 751 N.Y.S.2d 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tillery-nyappdiv-2002.