People v. Tillery
224 A.D.2d 558, 638 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1171
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), imposed October 17, 1994.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see, People v Rolon, 220 AD2d 543). The defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Tillery, 224 A.D.2d 558, 638 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
224 A.D.2d 558 (People v. Tillery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. DeBoue
299 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)