People v. Tillery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tillery

224 A.D.2d 558, 638 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1171

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 13, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 224 A.D.2d 558 (People v. Tillery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tillery, 224 A.D.2d 558, 638 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), imposed October 17, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see, People v Rolon, 220 AD2d 543). The defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), imposed October 17, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see, People v Rolon, 220 AD2d 543). The defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 558, 638 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tillery-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack