People v. Tierney
7 P. 37, 67 Cal. 54, 1885 Cal. LEXIS 541
Opinion
On the trial of the defendant, who was charged with the crime of rape, the prosecutrix was permitted, against the objection and exception of the defendant, to give in evidence the particulars of the complaint which she testified she made to Mrs. Kieley shortly after the occurrence. This was held erroneous by this court in the recent case of People v. Mayes, 66 Cal. 597. On the authority of that case the judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Myrick, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Tierney, 7 P. 37, 67 Cal. 54, 1885 Cal. LEXIS 541 (Cal. 1885).
7 P. 37 (People v. Tierney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Adams
93 P.2d 146 (California Supreme Court, 1939)
People v. Branch
246 P. 811 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)
People v. Lambert
52 P. 307 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Harmon v. Territory of Oklahoma
1897 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1897)
People v. Stewart
32 P. 8 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Hannon v. State
36 N.W. 1 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1888)