People v. Tidwell

207 A.D.2d 957, 617 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10120
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct. Although the prosecutor twice referred to the defense approach as a "smoke screen”, those references were isolated and do not constitute such a pervasive pattern of misconduct that reversal is warranted (see, People v Mott, 94 AD2d 415). Finally, defendant’s sentence is not harsh or excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—Criminally Negligent Homicide.) Present—Pine, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tidwell, 207 A.D.2d 957, 617 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 957 (People v. Tidwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Moore
32 A.D.3d 1354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Waters
248 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Goncalves
239 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Smart
224 A.D.2d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)