People v. Tiburcio

136 A.D.3d 584, 25 N.Y.S.3d 593
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 2016·No. 303 1921N/07·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered March 9, 2009, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that he is entitled to relief under People v Peque (22 NY3d 168 [2013], cert denied 574 US —, 135 S Ct 90 [2014]) based on the absence of warnings, at the time of his plea, regarding the possibility of deportation is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Defendant has not established that the exception to the preservation requirement set forth in Peque (id. at 182-183) should apply. Before imposing sentence, the court specifically warned defendant that the conviction could result in deportation, but defendant did not move to withdraw his plea. In any event, given the circumstances of the plea, it is unlikely that defendant could make the requisite showing of prejudice under Peque {id. at 198-201) if granted a hearing.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tiburcio, 136 A.D.3d 584, 25 N.Y.S.3d 593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 584 (People v. Tiburcio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Romero
2020 NY Slip Op 04781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Fernandez
2017 NY Slip Op 4890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)