People v. Thurmond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Thurmond

294 A.D.2d 608, 743 N.Y.S.2d 280, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5652

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 2002·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered September 13, 2000, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Fiol, 279 AD2d 477; People v Lyons, 197 AD2d 708). Prudenti, P.J., Smith, Friedmann and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered September 13, 2000, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Fiol, 279 AD2d 477; People v Lyons, 197 AD2d 708). Prudenti, P.J., Smith, Friedmann and Adams, JJ., concur.

People v. Thurmond, 294 A.D.2d 608, 743 N.Y.S.2d 280, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

294 A.D.2d 608 (People v. Thurmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related