People v. Thrower

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Thrower

300 A.D.2d 417, 750 N.Y.S.2d 785

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 300 A.D.2d 417 (People v. Thrower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Thrower, 300 A.D.2d 417, 750 N.Y.S.2d 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), both rendered March 16, 2000, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree under Indictment No. 98-01529, and burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 98-01692, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt under both indictments beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), both rendered March 16, 2000, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree under Indictment No. 98-01529, and burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 98-01692, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt under both indictments beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 417, 750 N.Y.S.2d 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thrower-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack