People v. Thorpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Thorpe

29 A.D.3d 768, 813 N.Y.S.2d 912

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thorpe. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 A.D.3d 467 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 16, 2006·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), dated September 8, 2004, which, upon his consent, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., Santucci, Mastro, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), dated September 8, 2004, which, upon his consent, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., Santucci, Mastro, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.

People v. Thorpe, 29 A.D.3d 768, 813 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

29 A.D.3d 768 (People v. Thorpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related