People v. Thompson

47 Misc. 2d 893, 263 N.Y.S.2d 440, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1584
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided August 13, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction of petit larceny should be affirmed. Judgment of conviction of vagrancy should be reversed on the law and facts and complaint dismissed. The People failed to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Furthermore, we do not approve of the practice of assigning a different lawyer to represent the defendant at each of his appearances in court. The requirements of due process are not met if a defendant is deprived of his constitutional right to the effective aid of counsel in preparing his defense (Glasser v. United States, 315 U. S. 60, 71; Powell v. Alabama, 287 U. S. 45; Jones v. Cunningham, 313 F. 2d 347, 353).

Concur — Di Giovanna, Gulotta and Brenner, JJ.

Judgment of conviction of petit larceny affirmed. Judgment of conviction of vagrancy reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 47 Misc. 2d 893, 263 N.Y.S.2d 440, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

47 Misc. 2d 893 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Figueroa v. Figueroa
160 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)