People v. Thompson

2017 NY Slip Op 3541
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.3d 922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 2017·No. 2015-03094·Published

Opinion

People v Thompson (2017 NY Slip Op 03541)
People v Thompson
2017 NY Slip Op 03541
Decided on May 3, 2017
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 3, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
JEFFREY A. COHEN
HECTOR D. LASALLE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2015-03094
(Ind. No. 116/13)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Christopher Thompson, appellant.


Thomas N. N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, NY (Steven Levine of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed March 30, 2015, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

ENG, P.J., HALL, COHEN, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 2017 NY Slip Op 3541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 3541 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)