People v. Thompson

33 A.D.3d 825, 822 N.Y.S.2d 451
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 17, 2006·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), rendered December 10, 2003, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]; People v Castillo, 47 NY2d 270, 274-277 [1979]; People v Mitteager, 44 NY2d 927, 928 [1978]).

The defendant’s contention that his adjudication as a persistent violent felony offender violated his right to a jury trial is unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, is without merit (see People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]; see also People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61, 67 [2005]).

The defendant’s contentions raised in his supplemental pro se brief are without merit. Miller, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 33 A.D.3d 825, 822 N.Y.S.2d 451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

33 A.D.3d 825 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berry v. Marchinkowski
137 F. Supp. 3d 495 (S.D. New York, 2015)
People v. Parks
53 A.D.3d 688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Hammon
47 A.D.3d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Campbell
38 A.D.3d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Ayala
36 A.D.3d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)