People v. Thompson

300 A.D.2d 1081, 751 N.Y.S.2d 805
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 271 A.D.2d 555

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of Cayuga County Court (Corning, J.), entered October 10, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of County Court convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal pos-

[1082]*1082session of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [former (4)]). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the waiver by defendant of his right to appeal, which is valid and all-encompassing on its face (see People v Luke, 281 AD2d 947, lv denied 96 NY2d 864, cert denied 534 US 1025), bars consideration of the contention that defendant now raises with respect to suppression issues (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833; see also People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 7-11). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Present — Hayes, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 300 A.D.2d 1081, 751 N.Y.S.2d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 1081 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kemp
724 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Luke
281 A.D.2d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)