People v. Thompson

286 A.D.2d 453, 730 N.Y.S.2d 236, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8069
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 20, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered June 2, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to give a missing witness charge is unpreserved for appellate review (see, 470.05 [2]). In any event, it is without merit, since the People demonstrated that the witness was not under their control (see, People v Macana, 84 NY2d 173, 177-178).

The defendant’s sentence was not illegal or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 286 A.D.2d 453, 730 N.Y.S.2d 236, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 453 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dell
11 A.D.3d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)