People v. Thompson

240 A.D.2d 769, 660 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7069
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D.2d 604

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered February 8, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his judgment of conviction should be reversed because the People failed to disclose certain material at trial pursuant to People v Rosario (9 NY2d 286, cert denied 386 US 866) is without merit. The record supports the court’s determination, made after a hearing, that the material in question had been turned over to the defense (see, People v Rodriguez, 210 AD2d 357).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 84).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 240 A.D.2d 769, 660 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 769 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rosario
173 N.E.2d 881 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Rodriguez
210 A.D.2d 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)