People v. Thompson

152 A.D.2d 949, 544 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9822
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: As a condition to the acceptance of his plea, defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal from the court’s denial of his suppression motion (see, People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829, cert denied 423 US 873; People v Smith, 142 AD2d 195, affd 74 NY2d 1; People v Seaberg, 139 AD2d 53, affd 74 NY2d 1; People v Durant, 101 AD2d 1008). Although defendant’s plea did not waive his [950]*950jurisdictional claim (see, People v Case, 42 NY2d 98, 99-100), that claim lacks merit because defendant possessed contraband in Niagara County (see, CPL 20.40 [1] [a]; People v Botta, 100 AD2d 311, 313-315; People v Lowen, 100 AD2d 518, 519). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. —criminal possession of controlled substance, fourth degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 152 A.D.2d 949, 544 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 949 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Roe
191 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)