People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Thompson

64 A.D.2d 641, 406 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 641 (People v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Thompson, 64 A.D.2d 641, 406 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 19, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (three counts), assault in the third degree (two counts) and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of grand larceny in the third degree, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The crime of grand larceny in the third degree is an inclusory concurrent count of robbery in the second degree, of which appellant stands convicted. Thus, the conviction under the grand larceny charge must be reversed and that count dismissed (see People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847; People v Reynolds, 53 AD2d 877). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Martuscello, J. P., Damiani, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 19, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (three counts), assault in the third degree (two counts) and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of grand larceny in the third degree, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The crime of grand larceny in the third degree is an inclusory concurrent count of robbery in the second degree, of which appellant stands convicted. Thus, the conviction under the grand larceny charge must be reversed and that count dismissed (see People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847; People v Reynolds, 53 AD2d 877). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Martuscello, J. P., Damiani, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 641, 406 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thompson-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack