People v. Thompson

203 Ill. App. 296
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 22, 1917
DocketGen. No. 22,610
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 Ill. App. 296 (People v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Thompson, 203 Ill. App. 296 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Indictment and ineobmation, § 62*—when allowance of amendment to information is proper. Where an information was amended by striking out the name of one party as defendant, whose name had been inserted by a clerical error on the part of the person who transcribed the information, and inserting the name of another and the proper party, held that there was no error in allowing such amendment. 3. Receiving stolen goods, § 11*—when jury must malee finding as to value of property. In a prosecution by information, charging the defendant with unlawfully concealing or aiding to conceal the property of another of a certain value, knowing same to be stolen property, it is indispensable to a judgment that there be a finding as to the value of the property, as same is required under the statute in fixing the punishment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Kusel
213 P. 367 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 Ill. App. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thompson-illappct-1917.