People v. Thompson

California Court of Appeal

People v. Thompson

90 P.2d 598, 32 Cal. App. 2d 665, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 417

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Cal. App. 2d 339 →

California Court of Appeal·Decided May 17, 1939·No. Crim. No. 3183·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

After having given notice of appeal in the superior court from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, appellant presented to the trial judge his request for a transcript, but failed to set forth therein the grounds of his appeal. He filed no brief in this court, nor did he make any appearance herein.

For the foregoing reasons, and pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial are, and each of them is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

After having given notice of appeal in the superior court from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, appellant presented to the trial judge his request for a transcript, but failed to set forth therein the grounds of his appeal. He filed no brief in this court, nor did he make any appearance herein.

For the foregoing reasons, and pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial are, and each of them is, affirmed.

People v. Thompson, 90 P.2d 598, 32 Cal. App. 2d 665, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 417 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

90 P.2d 598 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.