People v. Thompkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Thompkins

70 A.D.2d 673, 416 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12150

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 673 (People v. Thompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Thompkins, 70 A.D.2d 673, 416 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered April 5, 1978, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of official misconduct. We agree with defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed upon him, to the extent that it included a period of incarceration, was excessive. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting so much thereof as imposed a period of incarceration and by increasing the period of probation to three years, as required by section 65.00 (subd 3, par [b]) of the Penal Law, under the same terms and conditions as previously imposed by the sentencing court and agreed to by the defendant, and, as so modified, affirmed. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., and Main, JJ., concur; Mahoney, P. J., not taking part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered April 5, 1978, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of official misconduct. We agree with defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed upon him, to the extent that it included a period of incarceration, was excessive. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting so much thereof as imposed a period of incarceration and by increasing the period of probation to three years, as required by section 65.00 (subd 3, par [b]) of the Penal Law, under the same terms and conditions as previously imposed by the sentencing court and agreed to by the defendant, and, as so modified, affirmed. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., and Main, JJ., concur; Mahoney, P. J., not taking part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 673, 416 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thompkins-nyappdiv-1979.