People v. Thomas

93 Misc. 2d 961, 404 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1978 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2162
CourtMount Vernon City Court
DecidedApril 3, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 Misc. 2d 961 (People v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mount Vernon City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Thomas, 93 Misc. 2d 961, 404 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1978 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2162 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Irving B. Kendall, J.

In a decision of this court dated February 21, 1978, we ruled that the City Court of Mount Vernon lacked geographical jurisdiction over a misdemeanor committed in New York City even though the crime was allegedly committed well within 100 yards of the line separating the two cities.

We relied on what to this court was the very clear language of CPL 20.50 (subd 2) which states: "2. Where an offense prosecutable in a local criminal court is committed in a city other than New York City * * * but within one hundred yards of any other such political subdivision, it may be prosecuted in either such political subdivision.” (Emphasis added.)

In his motion to reargue the decision of this court, the [962]*962District Attorney has chosen to ignore the limiting words which I emphasized in the last paragraph "other than New York City.”

It is clear that the distinction between CPL 20.50 and 20.40 is the grade of the crime. A felony committed within 500 yards of any of two counties can be prosecuted in either county (in the appropriate County Court), but a misdemeanor or violation or other petty offense prosecutable in a local criminal court, and local criminal courts are well defined in CPL 1.20 (subd 21), can be prosecuted in either of two adjoining cities, towns or villages if committed within 100 yards of the boundary line.

It is to be noted that local criminal courts have trial jurisdiction of all offenses other than felonies. (See CPL 10.20, subd 1.)

The District Attorney’s motion to reargue is granted but the original decision of this court dismissing the information herein not on the merits but on jurisdictional grounds is adhered to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Griffin
99 Misc. 2d 874 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 Misc. 2d 961, 404 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1978 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thomas-nymtverncityct-1978.