People v. Thomas

136 A.D.3d 485, 24 N.Y.S.3d 510
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 A.D.3d 1068
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 9, 2016·No. 85 1293/11·Published

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered September 7, 2011, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in *486 the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony, to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s unpreserved challenges to the validity of his plea do not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725 [1995]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 136 A.D.3d 485, 24 N.Y.S.3d 510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 485 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Toxey
655 N.E.2d 160 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)