People v. Thomas

197 A.D.2d 914, 602 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 A.D.2d 624

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, new trial granted on count four of indictment and count three of indictment dismissed without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges under count three of indictment to another Grand Jury. Memorandum: Reversal is mandated by the trial court’s [915]*915charge on reasonable doubt (see, People v Sosby, 197 AD2d 909 [decided herewith]). Inasmuch as defendant was convicted of the lesser included offense of robbery in the third degree under count three of the indictment, that count is dismissed without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges under that count to another Grand Jury (see, People v Gonzalez, 61 NY2d 633, 635; People v Grant, 197 AD2d 910 [decided herewith]). A new trial is granted on count four of the indictment. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Robbery, 3rd Degree.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Green, Lawton, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 197 A.D.2d 914, 602 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9382 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

197 A.D.2d 914 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gonzalez
459 N.E.2d 1285 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Sosby
197 A.D.2d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Grant
197 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)