People v. Thomas

190 A.D.2d 874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 162 A.D.2d 822

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered January 16, 1991, convicting him of rape in the first degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, People v Mardis, 190 AD2d 866 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 190 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 874 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mardis
190 A.D.2d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)