People v. Thomas

154 A.D.2d 928, 546 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12988
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 6, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s argument that he was denied a fair trial by the prosecutor’s remarks on summation, to which no objection was made, is without merit. The remarks were fair comment on defense counsel’s summation and a fair response to defense counsel’s cross-examination of the victim (see, People v Rubin, 101 AD2d 71, 77-78).

We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J. — attempted rape, first degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 154 A.D.2d 928, 546 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12988 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

154 A.D.2d 928 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Clarke
250 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)