People v. Thomas
This text of 283 A.D. 995 (People v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted. Memorandum: During the charge to the jury, the court referred on several occasions to the statements given by appellant as confessions. A reading of those statements indicates that they were in no sense an admission by appellant of the crime of burglary, third degree. We feel that the characterization of such statements as confessions constituted error which deprived appellant of a fair and impartial trial. (See People v. Doria, 281 App. Div. 918.) All concur. (Appeal from a judgment convicting defendant of the crime of burglary, third degree.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kim-ball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 995, 130 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thomas-nyappdiv-1954.