Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Thomas

People v. Thomas

553 N.E.2d 1022, 75 N.Y.2d 888, 554 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 570
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 22, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 553 N.E.2d 1022 (People v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Thomas, 553 N.E.2d 1022, 75 N.Y.2d 888, 554 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 570 (N.Y. 1990).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. Defendant’s request for the plea and sentence minutes of his accomplice as Rosario material (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, cert denied 368 US 866), asserted for the first time on appeal under CPL 380.70, is unpreserved because it was made to the trial court on a bare claim of entitlement with no specific response to the court’s request for a relevant legal predicate. The other claimed errors in the prosecutor’s summation are also either unpreserved or without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Thompson
177 Misc. 2d 803 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 N.E.2d 1022, 75 N.Y.2d 888, 554 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thomas-ny-1990.