People v. Thomas

227 N.W.2d 257, 58 Mich. App. 218, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1692
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Mich. App. 777
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 1975·No. Docket No. 18589·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On July 2, 1973 defendant entered [219]*219a plea of guilty to a charge of unarmed robbery, MCLA 750.530; MSA 28.798. The plea was accepted, and the defendant was sentenced to a term of 3 to 15 years in prison and he appeals as of right.

On appeal, defendant claims that the trial judge did not inform him of the maximum sentence for the offense to which the plea was offered as required by GCR 1963, 785.7(l)(b). An examination of the plea transcript substantiates this allegation, although we note from the plea transcript that the assistant prosecutor did state the maximum sentence. This, however, is insufficient compliance with the court rule. See People v Hubbard, 57 Mich App 542; 226 NW2d 557 (1975); People v Shekoski, 393 Mich 134; 224 NW2d 656 (1974).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 227 N.W.2d 257, 58 Mich. App. 218, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1692 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).

227 N.W.2d 257 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Shekoski
224 N.W.2d 656 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1974)
People v. Hubbard
226 N.W.2d 557 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1975)