People v. Thomas J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Thomas J.

98 A.D.2d 783, 470 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21111

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 98 A.D.2d 783 (People v. Thomas J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Thomas J., 98 A.D.2d 783, 470 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Samenga, J.), imposed August 15, 1983, after his adjudication as a youthful offender upon his plea of guilty to arson in the third degree, the sentence being a term of imprisonment of one year and a $2,500 fine. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a five-year term of probation and a $2,500 fine. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to Criminal Term to fix the terms and conditions of probation. The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated. Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Samenga, J.), imposed August 15, 1983, after his adjudication as a youthful offender upon his plea of guilty to arson in the third degree, the sentence being a term of imprisonment of one year and a $2,500 fine. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a five-year term of probation and a $2,500 fine. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to Criminal Term to fix the terms and conditions of probation. The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated. Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 A.D.2d 783, 470 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thomas-j-nyappdiv-1983.