People v. Thigpen

11 A.D.3d 569, 782 N.Y.S.2d 651, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12038
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thigpen. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 A.D.3d 1047

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 28, 1998 (People v Thigpen, 256 AD2d 601 [1998]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 15, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thigpen, 11 A.D.3d 569, 782 N.Y.S.2d 651, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12038 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

11 A.D.3d 569 (People v. Thigpen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Stultz
810 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Thigpen
256 A.D.2d 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)