People v. Thayer

216 A.D.2d 934, 629 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7268
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thayer. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 A.D.2d 977

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of one count of sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [3]), and now contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. That contention is without merit. Defendant has [935]*935failed to demonstrate that he was deprived of a fair trial by less than meaningful representation. "[T]he evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [the] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that [defendant’s] attorney provided meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137,147; see, People v Russo, 85 NY2d 872, 874; People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021; People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184). (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J.—Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thayer, 216 A.D.2d 934, 629 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 934 (People v. Thayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Russo
649 N.E.2d 1195 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Flores
639 N.E.2d 19 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Hobot
646 N.E.2d 1102 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)