People v. Thatch

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Thatch

523 N.E.2d 814, 71 N.Y.2d 906, 528 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 544

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 523 N.E.2d 814 (People v. Thatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Thatch, 523 N.E.2d 814, 71 N.Y.2d 906, 528 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 544 (N.Y. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The question of whether defendant’s wife voluntarily consented to the search of their apartment presents a mixed question of law and fact. Having been resolved against the defendant in the lower courts, and finding support in the record, this question is now beyond our review (see, People v Meredith, 49 NY2d 1038, 1039).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI