People v. Thatch

523 N.E.2d 814, 71 N.Y.2d 906, 528 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 544
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 1988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The question of whether defendant’s wife voluntarily consented to the search of their apartment presents a mixed question of law and fact. Having been resolved against the defendant in the lower courts, and finding support in the record, this question is now beyond our review (see, People v Meredith, 49 NY2d 1038, 1039).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thatch, 523 N.E.2d 814, 71 N.Y.2d 906, 528 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 544 (N.Y. 1988).

523 N.E.2d 814 (People v. Thatch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Becker
2020 NY Slip Op 1437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)