People v. Thasa

296 N.E.2d 804, 32 N.Y.2d 712, 344 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1366
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 25, 1973
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 296 N.E.2d 804 (People v. Thasa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Thasa, 296 N.E.2d 804, 32 N.Y.2d 712, 344 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1366 (N.Y. 1973).

Opinion

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed on the ground that there is ample support for the affirmed findings of fact that the defendant was incapable of understanding or waiving constitutional rights accorded him by Miranda (see Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436) and that the People failed'to prove the voluntariness of the defendant’s confession beyond a reasonable doubt (see, e.g., People v. Valerius, 31 N Y 2d 51, 55). We pass on no other question.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuup and Judges Bubke, Bbeitel, Jasen, Gabbielli, Jones and Wachtleb.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rodriguez
111 Misc. 2d 747 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 N.E.2d 804, 32 N.Y.2d 712, 344 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thasa-ny-1973.