People v. Thasa

296 N.E.2d 804, 32 N.Y.2d 712, 344 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1366
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed on the ground that there is ample support for the affirmed findings of fact that the defendant was incapable of understanding or waiving constitutional rights accorded him by Miranda (see Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436) and that the People failed'to prove the voluntariness of the defendant’s confession beyond a reasonable doubt (see, e.g., People v. Valerius, 31 N Y 2d 51, 55). We pass on no other question.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuup and Judges Bubke, Bbeitel, Jasen, Gabbielli, Jones and Wachtleb.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thasa, 296 N.E.2d 804, 32 N.Y.2d 712, 344 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1366 (N.Y. 1973).

296 N.E.2d 804 (People v. Thasa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
111 Misc. 2d 747 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)