People v. Texidor

135 A.D.3d 455, 21 N.Y.S.3d 894
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 7, 2016
Docket16586 7685/00
StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.3d 455 (People v. Texidor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Texidor, 135 A.D.3d 455, 21 N.Y.S.3d 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obus, J.), entered June 25, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s upward departure was a provident exercise of discretion. Clear and convincing evidence established aggravating factors that were not otherwise adequately taken into account by the risk assessment guidelines (see e.g. People v Poole, 105 AD3d 654 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 863 [2013]). The underlying sex crime was committed, under egregious circumstances, during a burglary, and defendant’s background includes prior convictions for both a sex crime and a residential burglary. Defendant’s pattern of misconduct displays a likelihood of recidivism that outweighs the mitigating factors he cites. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Richter and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Poole
105 A.D.3d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.3d 455, 21 N.Y.S.3d 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-texidor-nyappdiv-2016.