People v. Texidor

62 A.D.3d 730, 877 N.Y.S.2d 702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Texidor. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 A.D.3d 1190

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), rendered January 31, 2008, convicting him of sexual abuse in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The decision to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously-entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780 [2005]; People v Mann, 32 AD3d 865 [2006]; People v Kucharczyk, 15 AD3d 595 [2005]). That decision will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see People v DeLeon, 40 AD3d 1008 [2007]). Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, there is nothing in the record which would warrant disturbing the County Court’s determination to deny his application to withdraw his plea of guilty. Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Covello, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Texidor, 62 A.D.3d 730, 877 N.Y.S.2d 702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

62 A.D.3d 730 (People v. Texidor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seeber
826 N.E.2d 797 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
People v. Kucharczyk
15 A.D.3d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Mann
32 A.D.3d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. DeLeon
40 A.D.3d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)