People v. Tetreault
This text of 131 A.D.3d 1327 (People v. Tetreault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*1328 Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County (McGill, J.), rendered April 22, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, with no sentencing commitment by County Court. The court sentenced defendant as a second felony offender to an aggregate prison term of seven years, followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, asserting that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. We disagree. Although defendant expressed remorse for his crimes and took steps to address his substance abuse problem, given his criminal history and his exposure to a much more substantial prison term, we find that County Court appropriately considered relevant information and factors in imposing the sentence, and the record evinces no extraordinary circumstances to warrant a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v O’Brien, 122 AD3d 957, 958 [2014]; People v Mitchell, 41 AD3d 1045, 1045-1046 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 924 [2007]).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 A.D.3d 1327, 16 N.Y.S.3d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tetreault-nyappdiv-2015.