People v. Terrell
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in approving defendant’s waiver of the right to a jury trial. The written waiver was signed by defendant before the Trial Judge in open court and recites that it was executed after consulta[932] tion with defense counsel and with a full understanding by defendant of his rights and a full appreciation that defendant was waiving them (see, CPL 320.10 [2]; People v Medina, 202 AD2d 256, 257, lv denied 83 NY2d 913). “[I]n the circumstances of this case, a written waiver is sufficient and is not invalidated by the court’s failure to inquire” (People v Burnett, 136 AD2d 888, lv denied 70 NY2d 1004; see also, People v Medina, supra, at 257), or to give defendant any particular warning or advice (see, People v Simmons, 182 AD2d 1018, 1019), absent some indication of a need to advise defendant or to make further inquiry of him (see, People v Stroud, 143 AD2d 532, lv denied 73 NY2d 790).
The verdict finding defendant guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]) is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The court, sitting as the trier of fact, did not fail to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see, People v Bleakley, supra, at 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Tills, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
277 A.D.2d 931 (People v. Terrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.