People v. Terrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Terrell

12 A.D.2d 624, 210 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6693

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 624 (People v. Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Terrell, 12 A.D.2d 624, 210 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief. Appellant is directed to file six copies of his typed brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the March Term, commencing February 27, 1961; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order denying without a hearing appellant’s coram nobis application. It appears that defendant either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal or that he has full knowledge of the contents of such papers. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief. Appellant is directed to file six copies of his typed brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the March Term, commencing February 27, 1961; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order denying without a hearing appellant’s coram nobis application. It appears that defendant either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal or that he has full knowledge of the contents of such papers. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 624, 210 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-terrell-nyappdiv-1960.