People v. Terrance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Terrance

199 A.D.2d 638, 605 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11765

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 638 (People v. Terrance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Terrance, 199 A.D.2d 638, 605 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered July 27, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of reckless endangerment in the first degree and driving while intoxicated.

Defendant’s only contention is that the 2 to 6-year prison sentence that he received upon his conviction of reckless endangerment in the first degree is harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he could receive the sentence ultimately imposed, which was less than the harshest possible sentence. Given these facts and defendant’s criminal record, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Weiss, P. J., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered July 27, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of reckless endangerment in the first degree and driving while intoxicated.

Defendant’s only contention is that the 2 to 6-year prison sentence that he received upon his conviction of reckless endangerment in the first degree is harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he could receive the sentence ultimately imposed, which was less than the harshest possible sentence. Given these facts and defendant’s criminal record, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Weiss, P. J., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 638, 605 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-terrance-nyappdiv-1993.