People v. Tenorio

Superior Court of Guam

People v. Tenorio

2 Guam 112

Superior Court of Guam·Decided December 14, 1979·No. Cr. No. 114F-79·Published

Opinion

ABBATE, Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

Defendant Raymond Quidachay's motion to dismiss was heard on December 14, 1979. Defendant contends that the indictment relating providing "escape implements" (§58.50 Criminal and Correctional Code of Guam) [9 GCA] is unconstitutionally vague.

Section 58.10(d) of the Guam Criminal and Correctional Code defines "escape implements". Therefore, it is the Decision of the Court that the Motion be and is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ABBATE, Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

Defendant Raymond Quidachay's motion to dismiss was heard on December 14, 1979. Defendant contends that the indictment relating providing "escape implements" (§58.50 Criminal and Correctional Code of Guam) [9 GCA] is unconstitutionally vague.

Section 58.10(d) of the Guam Criminal and Correctional Code defines "escape implements". Therefore, it is the Decision of the Court that the Motion be and is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

People v. Tenorio, 2 Guam 112 (superctguam 1979).

Pincite

2 Guam 112 (People v. Tenorio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.