People v. Tenorio

Superior Court of Guam

People v. Tenorio

2 Guam 112

CourtSuperior Court of Guam

DecidedDecember 14, 1979

DocketCr. No. 114F-79

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Guam 112 (People v. Tenorio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Guam primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tenorio, 2 Guam 112 (superctguam 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

ABBATE, Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

Defendant Raymond Quidachay's motion to dismiss was heard on December 14, 1979. Defendant contends that the indictment relating providing "escape implements" (§58.50 Criminal and Correctional Code of Guam) [9 GCA] is unconstitutionally vague.

Section 58.10(d) of the Guam Criminal and Correctional Code defines "escape implements". Therefore, it is the Decision of the Court that the Motion be and is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ABBATE, Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

Defendant Raymond Quidachay's motion to dismiss was heard on December 14, 1979. Defendant contends that the indictment relating providing "escape implements" (§58.50 Criminal and Correctional Code of Guam) [9 GCA] is unconstitutionally vague.

Section 58.10(d) of the Guam Criminal and Correctional Code defines "escape implements". Therefore, it is the Decision of the Court that the Motion be and is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Guam 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tenorio-superctguam-1979.