People v. Tennon

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Tennon

192 N.W.2d 661, 35 Mich. App. 605

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 26, 1971

DocketDocket No. 11572

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 N.W.2d 661 (People v. Tennon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tennon, 192 N.W.2d 661, 35 Mich. App. 605 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant was charged with robbery armed. MCLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.797). He pled guilty to an added count of robbery unarmed. MCLA § 750.530 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.798). He was sentenced to a term of 5 to 15 years in prison.

The defendant’s contention that his plea was not freely, understandingly, and voluntarily made because he was not advised of the consequence of his plea, namely, its effect on his probationary status is without merit. The law does not require such advice. People v. Dunn (1968), 380 Mich 693. Further, at the time of his plea the [606]*606defendant stated that he was not on probation, when asked by the judge. It is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial that no argument or formal submission is needed.

The motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant was charged with robbery armed. MCLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.797). He pled guilty to an added count of robbery unarmed. MCLA § 750.530 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.798). He was sentenced to a term of 5 to 15 years in prison.

The defendant’s contention that his plea was not freely, understandingly, and voluntarily made because he was not advised of the consequence of his plea, namely, its effect on his probationary status is without merit. The law does not require such advice. People v. Dunn (1968), 380 Mich 693. Further, at the time of his plea the [606]*606defendant stated that he was not on probation, when asked by the judge. It is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial that no argument or formal submission is needed.

The motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 N.W.2d 661, 35 Mich. App. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tennon-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack