People v. Temple

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Temple

19 A.D.2d 919, 244 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2966

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 919 (People v. Temple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Temple, 19 A.D.2d 919, 244 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis affirmed. The form of the court’s statement — that defendant was entitled to a lawyer of his own choice — -was as explicit as that approved in People v. Fink (8 A D 2d 859, cert. den. 361 U. S. 920). Further, defendant was asked if the court’s statement of his rights was “ clear ” and, again, whether he understood his “ right to a lawyer ”, and to each question he replied, “Yes, sir.” Finally, the record compiled upon the hearing afforded defendant is sufficient to establish a competent and intelligent waiver. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis affirmed. The form of the court’s statement — that defendant was entitled to a lawyer of his own choice — -was as explicit as that approved in People v. Fink (8 A D 2d 859, cert. den. 361 U. S. 920). Further, defendant was asked if the court’s statement of his rights was “ clear ” and, again, whether he understood his “ right to a lawyer ”, and to each question he replied, “Yes, sir.” Finally, the record compiled upon the hearing afforded defendant is sufficient to establish a competent and intelligent waiver. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 919, 244 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-temple-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack