People v. Telehany
This text of 186 A.D.2d 1068 (People v. Telehany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The facts that defendant had been seeing a psychiatrist who prescribed medication to relieve anxiety and that he had been treated for alcohol abuse did not raise a doubt about defendant’s competency to understand the proceedings against him, appreciate their significance, and actively aid his attorney in his defense (see, Lokos v Capps, 625 F2d 1258, 1261, reh denied 631 F2d 732; People v Dudasik, 112 AD2d 20).
We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Scudder, J. — Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 4th Degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Law-ton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 A.D.2d 1068, 590 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-telehany-nyappdiv-1992.