People v. Telehany

186 A.D.2d 1068, 590 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11720
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The facts that defendant had been seeing a psychiatrist who prescribed medication to relieve anxiety and that he had been treated for alcohol abuse did not raise a doubt about defendant’s competency to understand the proceedings against him, appreciate their significance, and actively aid his attorney in his defense (see, Lokos v Capps, 625 F2d 1258, 1261, reh denied 631 F2d 732; People v Dudasik, 112 AD2d 20).

We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Scudder, J. — Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 4th Degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Law-ton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Telehany, 186 A.D.2d 1068, 590 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 1068 (People v. Telehany) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Grant
188 A.D.2d 1052 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)