People v. Teen

165 A.D.2d 931, 561 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11267
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 20, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered July 18, 1988, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

We find no abuse of discretion by County Court in its refusal to grant defendant’s request for an adjournment to retain counsel of his own choosing. Defendant’s request was made on the day he was scheduled to proceed to trial and was not accompanied by a sufficient explanation; defendant had a reasonable opportunity to retain private counsel (see, People v Lum, 102 AD2d 992). As to defendant’s remaining arguments, they are similarly lacking in merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Teen, 165 A.D.2d 931, 561 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11267 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

165 A.D.2d 931 (People v. Teen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sapienza
75 A.D.3d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)